There is nothing cynic about the new party formation

Some equate the party formation process underway with domination and others see it as undesirable or untenable strategy. In this piece, I will try to address the reasons behind these concerns. 

The domination factor

As we know it, when ELF-RC adopted a resolution to disband itself and be replaced by a broad base  political party, it considered many factors; and chief among them is the development of groundwork for a sustainable democracy in future Eritrea.  One approach to do the job is first to answer the ownership of the process. ELF-RC answered the question by proposing a broad base political party, in which the dynamics of Eritrean people is put to democratic function in shaping the process independent of ELF-RC or any other entity.

Now, I take the issue of domination seriously because it is a concern for some. However, making decision to voluntarily dissolve own organization is one unique phenomenon in Eritrea that renders the domination claim useless. The truth is if domination took center in the decision, ELF-RC would not have decided to dissolve itself. It would not have facilitated the set up of an independent commission mandated to lead the process. Second, domination inherently is not participatory: domination seeks to impose, dictate, and promote a set of political agenda for the sole benefit of a few. I am not even sure if any opposition organization is ever capable of or powerful enough to master the art of political domination in Eritrean politics. Now, the party formation process is open, transparent, democratic, and inclusive. Its programs and policies will reflect its members. This is no domination of ELF-RC.

The skeptics/critics factor

To be skeptical and critical of the party formation process is legitimate concern. I believe the process does not advocate for a blind support or unquestionable trust and allegiance from the public. The public arena should test the process. However, supporting a careful and through analysis of the party formation process creates an atmosphere where active and open involvement is encouraged. Yet, skepticism becomes unhelpful when it revolves around fears, suspicions, and imagined assumptions. This holds us all hostages. One aspect of the party formation is democratizing the process by promoting a culture of constructive debate in the Eritrean political discourse. This, among other things, is not to frame the discussion of the party process around negative experiences and notions.

The party strategy is poised to break such setbacks and barriers we carried over from the liberation era. Skepticism helps to the extent that it engages in a constructive discourse.  The party formation process should be viewed as an opportunity of change to move forward rather than a development to be feared.  I say the process of the party formation requires active participation and meaningful input with a healthy skepticism from the public.

The political commitment factor

Some present the party strategy as untenable effort. However, the deeper reason points rather to the lack of commitment and not to the viability of strategy itself. In our recent history, some have chosen to stay in the periphery rather than in the center of the struggle. I believe this provides unfettered latitude to stay unorganized and largely unproductive. In the absence of commitment, we know there is no accountability, there is no participation, and there is no alternative presented. We have created a political attitude that is characteristic of contempt and do little. We must face this culture, a culture that is draining our strength and vitality in the struggle against the dictator.

Properly understood, weak opposition is reflected in the lack of commitment of its people. This lack of commitment is not only detrimental to any party formation such as the one underway now, but also to the bigger cause, notably the fight for democratic Eritrea. The only way forward is to actively organize and voice your concern. The new party formation is primarily about citizens’ political commitment in the affairs of our country.

The success of establishing democratic governance in Eritrea largely depends on the political commitment of its citizens.  Yet, understanding a political commitment begins with understanding of one’s self. For example, asking questions such as ‘what have I done to change the situation in my country or in the opposition, why would the responsibility of change be limited to few Eritreans, and why would I point fingers at others and not at myself.’  In my opinion, the party formation opens up a new opportunity for Eritreans to strive and to be makers and shakers of their destiny. Let us stop being bogged down in controversies that bleed our resources and time. Joining the party is timely and a right choice. Cast your vote, make change, organize, and pave the way for the younger generation.

Conclusion

The party formation is for every concerned to come out in search of common ground. I do not believe ELF-RC is poised to monopolize or dominate the process behind the scene as is feared by some. For one, the ELF-RC that we know will disband as an organization; it will cease to function as a political entity. Second, in the founding congress, a confluence of diverse values, backgrounds, and political outlooks shape the policies and programs of the party. Third, as in any other politics, members will engage in choices and tradeoffs of ideas during the process of policy designing. I see no cynic design in here.

Skepticism and criticism on the process of the party formation is a welcome contribution. In my view, a blind support and passive acceptance of the party is not sustainable commitment. I also think skeptics should focus on debating ideas of the party with objective and unbiased mindset. We cannot afford to revert to old habits and irrelevant issues such as fear and suspicion. The party formation is a common endeavor that demands a common effort.

The new party formation process does not run by itself. Political party is about people; it is about participation and organization. The key to overcoming the present lack of participation and organization is political commitment. Let us stop the culture of wait and see, and start to ask ourselves - what have we done to do our share in the struggle. Understanding our own biases, weakness, and apprehensions might help us engage and shoulder our share of responsibilities rather than sinking into hype and rhetoric. We have the power to be agents of change.

Kahssay

February 22, 2008